<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Connected Bride &#187; wed 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.connectedbride.com/category/uncategorized/wed-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.connectedbride.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 19:05:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Wed 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedbride.com/2008/11/10/wed-20/</link>
		<comments>http://www.connectedbride.com/2008/11/10/wed-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 23:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[wed 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://connectedbride.wordpress.com/?p=188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For better or for worse (har, har), this site is all about planning a wedding using the tools and technologies known as web 2.0...I'll call it "wed 2.0", because if you haven't noticed yet, I am a huge dork! Before we get too far along, I want to take a moment to define what "wed 2.0" means to me. Some of the ideas are very well-known, some I have taken great liberties with. This definition will undoubtedly evolve over time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For better or for worse (har, har), this site is all about planning a wedding using the tools and technologies known as <a title="What is web 2.0" href="http://blogs.dfid.gov.uk/2008/11/content-for-all-%E2%80%93-how-web-20-can-help/" target="_blank">web 2.0</a>&#8230;I&#8217;ll call it &#8220;wed 2.0&#8243;, because if you haven&#8217;t noticed yet, I am a huge dork! Before we get too far along, I want to take a moment to define what &#8220;wed 2.0&#8243; means to me. Some of the ideas are very well-known, some I have taken great liberties with. This definition will undoubtedly evolve over time.<span id="more-188"></span></p>
<p><strong>A wed 2.0 service:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>makes it easy for non-technical brides and grooms to develop, share and access content</li>
<li>gets newbies up and running with a minimal learning curve</li>
<li>provides an organized, easy to use, intuitive experience</li>
<li>works great on all types of platforms from desktops to cell phones</li>
<li>encourages collaboration, information sharing and social networking</li>
<li>responds to trends quickly and nimbly</li>
<li>is free or low-cost</li>
</ul>
<p><em>Now, let&#8217;s talk about the types of services I will be gleefully bashing, the ones that make me fly into a rage&#8230;</em></p>
<p><strong>A non-wed 2.0 service</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>gets away with charging more than it should by using the word &#8220;wedding&#8221;</li>
<li>makes my iPhone crash, isn&#8217;t compatible with macs or different types browsers</li>
<li>takes forever to load a page</li>
<li>forces me to click through page after page searching for what I want</li>
<li>exists as a static website where users passively consume information</li>
<li>adds new features slowly</li>
<li>reacts to change instead of creating it</li>
</ul>
<p>Thoughts? What am I forgetting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.connectedbride.com/2008/11/10/wed-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
